Traffic.
Is it ever far from our minds?
Aquiring and monetizing web traffic is certainly one of the most important, and emotional issues we as Internet marketers face. We talk about it, develop schemes and technology to generate it, and pay dearly for it. The most spectacular product launches that we see are about how to get massive amounts of traffic.
Yes, we think about traffic A LOT!
And for good reason. No matter how good your content or offer is, you can’t have a viable business without traffic.
This post is part two in my blog series on developing a traffic strategy. You can read the first post here.
In this series, I’ll reveal the thought process and steps I take to develop a traffic strategy for Daily Marketing Ace.
At the prodding of Jonathan Paston, I promise I’ll not only share the good, but the bad and the ugly as well. It won’t serve my readers very well to provide a sugar-coated ’spin,’ so if I go off track and miss my goals, I’ll do so publicly.
If I’m going to share this process, I need to start at the beginning so you can see everything from start to finish. So I’m going to ask you to bear with me while I show you how I approach strategy development. This post will, hopefully, provide a context for the rest of the process.
But let me warn you, I can get a bit academic at times, so if I start to bore you… slap me.
Let’s start at the beginning. What is a strategy and how does it fit into a business?
Here’s a sketch right out of my notebook (I told you I’d share the ugly!):

What it shows is my view of how organizations (even organizations of one) can most effectively approach the process of developing and executing strategy.
Let me explain the ideas behind the drawings above as concisely as I can.
On the left, you see a pyramid — I call this the Strategic Pyramid.
At the top you have the vision for the organization — in this case, the organization is a business.
The next layer is strategies. Next comes projects (or tactics) and finally tasks.

The X axis (horizontal) of the pyramid shows ‘frequency’ and ‘organizational focal points’.
This simply means that the width of a layer in the pyramid indicates how much of the organization’s activity is spent in that layer (frequency) and how many ‘focal points’ exist in the layer.
If the layer is wide, it means that the focus of the organization is spread thin. It also means that more time and effort is spent in that layer than is spent in narrower layers.
In other words, the widest layer, tasks, has the highest freqency and most dispursed focus. The task layer is where the organization spreads out to get things done, and it is where most of the time is spent.
On the Y axis, I am showing ‘importance.’ This one is more obvious and easier to understand. Layers at the top of the pyramid have more importance than layers at the bottom in terms of moving the company forward.

Now take a look a the four-quadrant graph (there *must* be a name for this type of graph). You can see that the X and Y axes are still the same, but the data is being shown differently.
In the upper left corner, is the Low-Frequency/Sharp-Focus/High-Importance quadrant. Vision and strategies belong in this quadrant.
In the lower right corner, is the High-Frequency/Dispursed-Focus/Low-Importance quadrant. You can see where Projects and Tasks land in this quadrant.
Now, keep this in mind, it is extremely difficult to keep an organization focused on driving toward a unified vision. It is so easy to get lost on the morass of daily tasks that vision seldom comes to mind.
The only way to ensure that your vision becomes reality is to carefully craft your strategies — making sure that they serve your vision.
Then you must select projects that help you accomplish your strategies. After that, everything pretty much falls into place. Tasks support projects, which support strategies, which support the vision.
So now we see where strategies fit within the grand scheme of things.
But we haven’t really defined what a strategy is.
Strategies are simply the methods you expect to use to help your business attain it’s vision.
Now, Wikipedia might disagree with that definition. It’s kind of my own take on what a stategy is and it works for me, so I’m not really looking for someone elses definition.
Tasks are important, but only if they are the right tasks.
I know, from experience, that the worst thing a business can do is focus on the wrong tasks. It’s where you burn most of your time and resources.
In order to be successful, every business needs to make sure that their tasks are serving the right projects, which are serving the right strategies, which are *all* serving the vision.
So what I hope to come out of this exercise with is a traffic strategy that serves my vision for Daily Marketing Ace and a project or two that will help me accomplish that strategy.
So where do we start? With the vision of course. Without a clear vision, there can be no pyramid, just a blunt blob that will not help anyone.
In my next post, I’ll share my vision for Daily Marketing Ace with you. And, maybe, just maybe, we’ll be able to sink our teeth into a strategy.









6 Comments
Doug,
I appreciate your leadership and the thoughtful manner in which you conduct business.
This is so important: “In order to be successful, every business needs to make sure that their tasks are serving the right projects, which are serving the right strategies, which are *all* serving the vision.”
Thanks for sharing.
Patrick Pretty
Hey Patrick,
Thanks for stopping by and thanks for your comments.
Have a great evening!
Doug
Hi Doug.
Nice piece of work here!
Great thinking and what’s even better: great preparation.
It once more underlines the adage: “Prepare or Repair”. The real profits are in the preparation and that’s exactly what you’re doing here.
However….
I DO have some difficulty understanding your Y-axis as being ‘Importance’. From an operational point of view, and most of us are involved in that, I find it difficult to comprehend that tasks are not as important as visions and strategies.
I DO understand that missing one (or maybe a few) task will not jeopardize the whole venture, but missing them IS a flaw in the system. After all, they automatically evolve from the upper layers.
>Tasks are important, but only if they are the right tasks.
See? You say it yourself. And I can easily repeat that same sentence for vision, strategies and projects.
No, for me it’s not the importance that represents the Y-axis.
It’s more something like ‘Influence’, the impact that the layer has on the overall approach.
That may seem like a small change, but for me and my team members in daily task operations, it’s a motivator to have every task and project to be as important as any vision or strategy.
I would say ‘Influence’.
But ah, that’s just my 2 cts.
Hi Case,
You know, that was bugging me a bit too. You see, it works for me because I know what I mean, but in communicating it to others, the words are extremely critical.
“Influence” is indeed a better word. The other word that just occurred to me is “Impact.”
Of course, tasks are important. They are the ‘action’ piece of the puzzle. Strategies without tasks, or vision without tasks, or projects without tasks, are pretty much useless. So, as you say, assigning tasks a low level of importance is misleading.
The more I think about it, I like the word “impact” if only because “influence” is something I almost automatically associate with people. If something has influence, I tend to think that means that it affects a lot of people.
In any case, Case, you have provided some great food for thought and I appreciate your comments.
Hi Doug,
A very interesting read. I apreciate the content very much. I couldnt agree with you more; “In order to be successful, every business needs to make sure that their tasks are serving the right projects, which are serving the right strategies, which are *all* serving the vision.”
Too often one can lose vision on many tasks that come across our plate. Very well said. Serve the vision! Nice slogan
Keep up the great work!
David
Hi David,
Thanks for your comments. “Serve the Vision!” sounds almost Orwellian. LOL.
I had a few hours on a plane today to work on my next post in this case study. The post above and the next one on Vision are likely to be the hardest.
I already *think* I know what my traffic strategy will be, but know it’s worth the discipline to do things in the right order.
Interestingly, this site is now getting over 3x the amount of traffic it was getting when I started the case study. So, it is true, where you focus is where you will get results.
Doug
One Trackback
[…] been about six days since I posted part 2 in this series of posts about developing a traffic […]